| |
The demise of PRM as we know it
By Diane Krakora
To evaluate whether traditional PRM has become obsolete, first we must look at where PRM came from. Remember ChannelWave and Allegis? How about PartnerWare, OnDemand and WebBridge? In 2002 these organization were high flyers – the next big thing – doubling within one year into a $2 billion industry according to IDC. These solutions were helping companies "synchronize, optimize and understand sales and demand impacts across channels" according to META Group, at the time. But the value propositions of "creating a single selling experience across multiple organizational boundaries" (META 2002) never grew roots and these PRM-focused companies were either consolidated or folded. Gone is the old promise that one solution can fill all your partner management needs.
It really takes the entire company to ensure partnerships are successful. As partnerships touch all facets of the organization – marketing, field sales, finance, sales operations, legal, technical support, training, professional services and even product marketing are all affected by the success or failure of partnerships established by the channels or alliances groups. Thus the systems that help engage, empower and evaluate partners must also live in different parts of the organization. The promise of traditional PRM was to create one system that addressed and supported all these areas. That's crazy – these teams already have systems to manage their individual business unit processes.
PRM promised to be all things to all people, trying to solve several complex problems in one complete solution. These early solutions attempted to holistically re-engineer the way partners engaged with an organization, and the processes by which an organization managed their partners. This ended up to be too much process at one time – for both partners and the channel management team. Change is difficult for most people and the sweeping modifications in process, work flow and engagement styles required by these all-in-one PRM systems was too much at one time. Additionally, since effective partner management is a truly a team effort, the PRM system needed to integrate with other corporate systems – in marketing, sales, and training – to be successful, but PRM systems weren't implemented using this approach. We saw incredibly low adoption and usage rates by both partners and internal teams, which led to the demise of these solutions.
This all-in-one approach to PRM was both complex and expensive to implement. Average implementation times in the early years of PRM were between 10 and 16 months. Trying to get all the different groups that own the processes such as sales operations, marketing and training to agree on one system and one set of universal business practices was a monumental undertaking. And training and sales organizations weren't bought in to the idea that a PRM solution could meet their broader requirements, the PRM solution only addressed partner-related needs. Prices for PRM solutions ranged between $250,000 at the low-end to more than $1.5 million for a full application – and implementation costs could easily match the system price (AMR Oct 2001).
Today even the definition of PRM is unclear. Is PRM the software application that you buy or rent? Is PRM the process and partner programs? Is PRM the partner portal? Or is PRM "a business strategy to select and manage partners to optimize their long-term value to an enterprise" as defined by Bob Thompson, self-appointed PRM guru. Ask four different PRM vendors and you'll get four different answers. Ask 10 different companies with established channel programs and you're likely to see 10 very confused faces. It doesn't really matter, as traditional PRM is history. Gartner isn't even tracking PRM as a category anymore and instead directs users to B2B e-commerce solutions. According to Gartner "Partner relationship management functionality is no longer a separate B2B e-commerce application category and users should include PRM functionality in B2B e-commerce assessments." (September 2005). In a Google search for PRM, only one of the top ten responses is what we would consider "Partner Relationship Management" software. If it's not in Google, then "PRM as we knew it" MUST be history!
About the Author
Diane Krakora is President & CEO of Amazon Consulting,a consulting firm based in Silicon Valley, dedicated to helping high tech clients increase profitability by effectively developing and leveraging partners.For more information on Amazon Consulting, please visit http://www.amazonconsulting.com.
Article Source: http://www.simplysearch4it.com/article/38253.html
| If you wish to add the above article to your website or newsletters then please include the "Article Source: http://www.simplysearch4it.com/article/38253.html" as shown above and make it hyperlinked. |
| Some other articles by Diane Krakora | What's the deal?
Maybe it's just me, but it seems as though everyone is designing, developing or implementing deal registration programs. It seems deal registration progressed from an innovative idea ...
Agents and Influencers: The Same Yet Different
These two types of partnerships are so often discussed in the same breath, that one begins to wonder, aren't they really the same? Close, but not exactly. The differences ...
|
|
| |
|
