Article Categories
» Arts & Entertainment
» Automotive
» Business
» Careers & Jobs
» Education & Reference
» Finance
» Food & Drink
» Health & Fitness
» Home & Family
» Internet & Online Businesses
» Miscellaneous
» Self Improvement
» Shopping
» Society & News
» Sports & Recreation
» Technology
» Travel & Leisure
» Writing & Speaking

  Listed Article

  Category: Articles » Society & News » Environment » Article
 

Property Rights - The Impact of Air Pollution




By Barry Economics

The lack of defined property rights leads to the abuse of certain activities as a result of a differing perceptions regarding how choices affect marginal private benefits and social costs. How does this impact society and what does this say about how private enterprises make choices? let's use the example of pollution and the effects on property owners.

Let me give you an example, a particular firm that is polluting the air will continue to do so because to the firm, the private cost of polluting is zero, and the social costs need not be considered. The external costs imposed on society (the social cost of the pollution) will not be factored into cost analysis of the firm. The result is the overproduction of pollution, to the nearby landowner the experience of production externalities, because there is no preventive law allocating the air to any individual or entity. One method to prevent the overproduction of the 'bad' of pollution is to allocate air property rights to individuals. Now if the firm were to produce air pollution that was in excess to what particular land owners were comfortable with, these property owners would be provided a method to seek compensation for the pollution infringing on their land. The economic position of creating property rights for air is one which involves the prevention of the overproduction of air pollution by creating a deterrent effect with the establishment of the property right. Firms will be cognizant of the surrounding property owners, and will be more aware of the social costs of their pollution production.

Another effect of the property law is property value. Without the law, the particular value of land with considerable pollution will be lower, passing on the externality to the owner once again. If the courts allowed particular compensation for air pollution, this would permit the pareto efficient move, and prevent a pareto worsening move, the overproduction of the pollution. The establishment of the property rights is a method of externalising the costs of, in this case, pollution.

The economist responsible for the 'externalities' theory Dr. Coase suggested that the costs of the externalities could in fact be internalised to the cost-producer without external intervention, such as the courts. Rather than expending costs on creating new laws for pollution, Coase argued that the polluter and pollutee, if possible, could negotiate payments that would make each better off, thereby in the process choosing the Kaldor- Hicks (an economic measurement comparing total social costs to total social benefits) efficient combination of externality costs and subsequent reductions of these costs.

Coase was attempting to incorporate criteria for his theory to hold. This included decisions that minimized the sum of harms for both parties involved. If one firm is required to abate pollution, this in term is a pareto worsening move for the firm, yet beneficial to the particular land owner. A decision in the reverse would find the firm better off at the expense of the landowner. Therefore a solution must be reached that find the optimal amount of reduction for the firm that considers the maximum willingness to pay for abatement on behalf of the landowner. Another criteria suggest that negotiations will only take place if the net result leads to an increase in the value of production. Essentially once negotiating costs have been considered, the increase in the value of production should still be positive.

In a economic system that permits such negotiations, and if land owners have property laws in place to protect and facilitate both parties interested, than this alternate way of approaching the social costs of pollution and corresponding compensatory planning could expand and grow in popularity. Putting a cost to the amount of pollution based on a compensatory scale could make producers/private enterprises think twice about who is affected and how much pollution they are producing.
 
 
About the Author
DiscussEconomics is an online economic and financial dicussion forum that includes a number of topics including: foreign exchange discussions, interest rate indicators, economic indicators, economic anal

Article Source: http://www.simplysearch4it.com/article/26646.html
 
If you wish to add the above article to your website or newsletters then please include the "Article Source: http://www.simplysearch4it.com/article/26646.html" as shown above and make it hyperlinked.



  
  Recent Articles
Rechargeable Battery Recycling Corporation?
by goodbattery

Natural Gas - Britain Nearing End of Self Sufficiency
by Euan Blauvelt

Fuel Cell Cars Approved For Zero-Emission Push
by James Marriot

Wind Power - are industry critics quoting facts or tilting at windmills?
by Euan Blauvelt

Energy and the Environment - Nearly 90% of Global Warming Gas Emissions Are CO2
by Larry Butz

The Environment: A Global Overview
by Larry Butz

Pigeon Control
by Isaac Richards

The Future is Looking a Little Greener
by Mr Fezziwig

Air pollution Monitoring Equipment
by Anand

To cull or not to cull?
by Marco Schiess

The Energy Consumption Of Western Society
by Charles Hawkins

Biodiesel Fuel- What's It All About?
by Howard Gibson

A call for a UN Environmental Protection Force
by Marco Schiess

African Wind Energy
by Rick Chapo

All You Need To Know About Video Conferencing
by john victor

Curacao: Island of Wonder and Intrigue
by Jon Wuebben

Is A SoyChlor Plant Killing Animals, People, And Children In Jefferson Iowa?
by Spencer Fraise

An Environmental Plan and the Local Government.
by steven pike

Can't connect to database